Profile photoMarie Haynes
Google search-quality and site-recovery consultant
Best for: Google quality issues, algorithm recovery, helpful-content analysis and AI-assisted SEO
Buyer’s directory · evidence graded
Recovery work begins with diagnosis, not a promise. This ranking favours specialists who can distinguish manual actions, algorithmic shifts, technical failures, demand changes and measurement problems while communicating uncertainty clearly.
RANKED FOR THIS CATEGORY
Profile photoGoogle search-quality and site-recovery consultant
Best for: Google quality issues, algorithm recovery, helpful-content analysis and AI-assisted SEO
Profile photoTechnical SEO and algorithm-update consultant
Best for: Major Google update recovery, technical diagnostics, publishers and complex quality problems
Profile photoTechnical SEO and Google-penalty recovery consultant
Best for: Manual actions, link-risk recovery, technical SEO and enterprise search quality
Profile photoTechnical SEO consultant · Search Brothers
Best for: Google penalties, technical SEO, search quality and complex international sites
Profile photoTechnical SEO consultant · SEOSLY
Best for: Deep technical audits, AI SEO and teams needing senior audit training
Profile photoTechnical SEO consultant for news publishers
Best for: News publishers, editorial SEO, Google News and technical publishing systems
Profile photoTechnical SEO consultant and publisher
Best for: Google update analysis, content quality, ranking-factor research and publisher strategy
Profile photoIndependent technical and ecommerce SEO consultant
Best for: Mid-size and enterprise sites facing SERP-feature, ecommerce or algorithmic issues
Profile photoTechnical SEO consultant and educator
Best for: Technical SEO, JavaScript, ecommerce and upskilling SEO teams
Profile photoBest for: B2B SaaS, fintech, semantic SEO, AI-search visibility and revenue-led organic growth
Independent matching
I’ll review your company, problem and budget, then send a focused shortlist. No pay-to-rank placements and no generic agency spreadsheet.
Methodology
Scores are a starting point, not a substitute for fit. Each category changes the weighting so a technical-recovery specialist is not judged like a SaaS growth lead.
A defensible process for separating penalties, updates, technical loss and demand change.
Current knowledge of Google systems, quality signals and site-wide risk.
Attributable examples and a realistic view of causality and timelines.
No guaranteed recovery claims and clear limits around public evidence.
Official evidence plus multiple relevant third-party sources or attributable results.
Official evidence plus at least one meaningful corroborating source.
Identity and specialism are visible, but independent results or reviews remain limited.
Dan Akeju created this directory and is included in it. No consultant paid for placement. The 5-point directory assessment is the editorial score divided by 20. Credentials, results, reviews and testimonials receive evidence-coverage scores based on attributable public sourcing. These are not customer ratings or invented outcomes. Age receives 0/100 when no reliable public source exists and is never estimated.
Suggest a correction →Compare by location